That's what came to mind when I read reports of research conducted on a "specially designed vertical workstation" that "can be locked in place over a treadmill, allowing employees to work at a computer while simultaneously walking on the spot."
The Mayo Clinic researchers who designed the "walk-and-work" desk aren't interested in the health of all sedentary workers in cubicle farms across the globe, though. Oh, no. They're pitching the the contraption as a way to "help overweight workers" lose weight.
Doesn't this conjure up images of overseers -- um, I mean supervisors -- with whips standing behind rows of corpulent workers on treadmills?
Note that in the CBC article the principal researcher, Dr. James Levine, is reported to have claimed that by using the "vertical workstation" an "obese employee could shed 45 to 65 pounds over the course of a year." Thereby proving that he is ignorant of the current state of the science about weight and weight loss, in which it is now understood that the old "calories in minus calories out" formula is woefully inadequate at predicting weight loss. (Never mind, also, that there's absolutely no research indicating anyone who loses weight will keep it off long-term -- the body fights to defend what it, not what society or science or medicine, thinks is natural.)
Perhaps the saddest thing about this line of research, though, and the media reports it will spawn, is that it misses the opportunity to promote healthy activity for ALL desk jockeys. If the opportunity to walk while computing is so great, why not offer it to all sedentary workers? Which, of course, would include many slender people...and NOT all fat people. (Of course, anorexics and anorexic-wanna-bes would love it.)
Researching and promoting treadmill workstations as a "bariatric" or weight-focused intervention just furthers prejudice, discrimination, and stigma about fatness. Sadly, though, that's where the money is.
Recent Comments